Skip to content
shadowiq
Regulation · GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679)

GDPR Article 22 explainability, automated.

GDPR didn't stop being relevant when the AI Act arrived. ShadowIQ automates DPIAs, enforces cross-border residency, and produces Article 22 explainability artifacts from signed decisions.

What this is

Summary

GDPR for AI systems requires data protection impact assessments (Article 35), compliance with automated decision-making rules (Article 22), cross-border transfer controls (Chapter V), and data minimization (Article 5). ShadowIQ automates DPIAs, enforces residency as code, and generates Article 22 explainability artifacts.

How it fits · explainer

The crosswalk: article → control → signed evidence.

GDPR (AI) · ARTICLEREQUIREMENTSHADOWIQ CONTROLSIGNED EVIDENCEArt. 5(1)(c)Data minimizationGateway PII redactionSigned redaction eventsArt. 22Automated decision makingExplainability records + HITLSigned decision + explanationArt. 25Data protection by designPolicy-as-code default-denySigned policy postureArt. 30Records of processing activitiesRegistry + processing logSigned ROPA entriesArt. 35DPIAAuto-DPIA engineSigned DPIA artifactCROSSWALK · 5 SHOWN · FULL MAP IN /DOCS/COMPLIANCE · SIGNED ED25519
Where it hurts

You've heard this one before.

  • Data subject requests for AI-driven decision explanations.
  • Cross-border transfers to US AI services without SCCs.
  • DPIAs that take weeks because data is scattered.
  • No clear lawful basis record for AI training data.
What we do about it

Three moves.

  1. 1
    Article 22 explainability, automated.

    Every automated decision records model fingerprint, policy version, input hash, and output — signed. Explainability responses draft automatically for Legal approval.

  2. 2
    Residency-as-code.

    Pin tenants to EU regions; the gateway refuses to route to a non-adequate provider. SCCs, TIAs, and DPAs download from the trust center.

  3. 3
    Data minimization at the gateway.

    PII redaction means personal data doesn't leave the perimeter unless it's necessary. 'Necessary' becomes a policy, not a best-intent.

Outcomes

Numbers, not adjectives.

100%
Article 22 responses evidenced
4
EU regions · residency-pinned
4%
global turnover · max fine
Full crosswalk

GDPR (AI) article → ShadowIQ control → signed evidence.

Article
Requirement
ShadowIQ control
Signed evidence
Art. 5(1)(c)
Data minimization
Gateway PII redaction
Signed redaction events
Art. 22
Automated decision making
Explainability records + HITL
Signed decision + explanation
Art. 25
Data protection by design
Policy-as-code default-deny
Signed policy posture
Art. 30
Records of processing activities
Registry + processing log
Signed ROPA entries
Art. 35
DPIA
Auto-DPIA engine
Signed DPIA artifact
Ch. V
Cross-border transfers
Residency-as-code + SCCs
Signed routing + contract
Frequently asked

Asked, answered, sourced.

Every automated decision records model fingerprint, policy version, input hash, and output — Ed25519-signed. When a data subject requests explanation, a draft response pulls from the signed record; Legal reviews before sending.

ShadowIQ supports the EU-US DPF, SCCs with TIAs, and regional deployment entirely inside EU/UK for customers that require it. Residency policies are enforced at the gateway.

Only under an adequate transfer mechanism. The gateway supports 'EU data → EU-resident provider only' as a policy — violating requests are denied and signed.

Ready to see the signet in motion?

Your 30-minute demo. A signed audit trail by the end of it.

We'll wire ShadowIQ into one live workload, block a prompt injection in real time, and hand you a cryptographic receipt — before the meeting ends.